The Bookseller of Kabul by Asne Seierstad - not a title I would have normally picked, but fitting in nicely with this year's resolution to read more of foreign places. So why was I a little nervous about reading it?
"I have written down what I saw and heard, and have tried to gather my impressions of a Kabul spring, of those who tried to throw the winter off, grow and blossom, and others who felt condemned to go on 'eating dust', as Leila would have put it."
I think my primary worry was that this was a book written by someone invited in good faith to this family's home who made notes on their conversations, the things they told her and the events she witnessed; and then she returned to her comfortable home, far removed from theirs, and wrote about them. This kind of behaviour makes me uncomfortable, as though I've overheard something I'm not supposed to. So I started off discomforted by it, and then I came across this:
"One powerful man had found an especially good stone, large and jagged, and he threw this with force, aiming it carefully at her body, and it struck so violently in her abdomen that soon the first blood of the afternoon showed through the chaderi."
Only 31 pages in and I'm rendered horrified, so nauseated by this sentence that I want to hide the book and run away. But I don't, and I keep going because these stories need to be told, almost regardless of who does the telling. There is no other sentence in here that made my blood run quite so cold. Have never understood the lust for violence; nor the bred-in-the-bone, natural-as-breathing belief in women as lesser beings. If you can't be used as a marriage bargaining chip or a breeder of children, your voice, your wishes count for nothing.
" 'She's crying, she doesn't want to,' her two older sisters tell Sultan and Sharifa in front of Belqisa. Belqisa looks down. But Sharifa laughs. It's a good sign when the bride is unwilling. That indicates a pure heart."
And then there's the Taliban: their rules seem drawn up merely to crush individualism, and more still just there to suck the joy out of every day:
"Prohibition against female exposure...prohibition against music...prohibition against shaving...mandatory prayer...prohibition against the rearing of pigeons and bird-fighting...eradication of narcotics and the users thereof...prohibition against kite-flying...prohibition against reproduction of pictures...prohibition against gambling...prohibition against British and American hairstyles...prohibition against interest on loans, exchange charges and charges on transactions...prohibition against the washing of clothes by river embankments...prohibition against music and dancing at weddings...prohibition against playing drums...prohibition against tailors sewing women's clothes or taking measurements of women...prohibitions against witchcraft..."
And lets not forget the separate 'women-only' clause:
"If women dress fashionably, wear ornamented, tight, seductive clothes to show off, they will be damned by the Islam Sharia and can never expect to go to heaven. They will be threatened, investigated and severely punished by the religious police, as will the head of the family."
This is no easy read: it provides no answers and although the author attempts to remain impartial, you can sense her anger and incomprehension at the treatment women receive, even those in the fairly enlightened family she is staying with, running like a red vein through the book. Leila's existence almost chokes you with it's poignancy and you wish bitterly that the change taking place in that country would get there a little faster.
"She feels her heart, heavy and lonely like a stone, condemned to be crushed for ever. Leila turns, takes three paces to the door, closes it quietly behind her and goes out. Her crushed heart she leaves behind."
I am ashamed of my own complaining.
"I have written down what I saw and heard, and have tried to gather my impressions of a Kabul spring, of those who tried to throw the winter off, grow and blossom, and others who felt condemned to go on 'eating dust', as Leila would have put it."
I think my primary worry was that this was a book written by someone invited in good faith to this family's home who made notes on their conversations, the things they told her and the events she witnessed; and then she returned to her comfortable home, far removed from theirs, and wrote about them. This kind of behaviour makes me uncomfortable, as though I've overheard something I'm not supposed to. So I started off discomforted by it, and then I came across this:
"One powerful man had found an especially good stone, large and jagged, and he threw this with force, aiming it carefully at her body, and it struck so violently in her abdomen that soon the first blood of the afternoon showed through the chaderi."
Only 31 pages in and I'm rendered horrified, so nauseated by this sentence that I want to hide the book and run away. But I don't, and I keep going because these stories need to be told, almost regardless of who does the telling. There is no other sentence in here that made my blood run quite so cold. Have never understood the lust for violence; nor the bred-in-the-bone, natural-as-breathing belief in women as lesser beings. If you can't be used as a marriage bargaining chip or a breeder of children, your voice, your wishes count for nothing.
" 'She's crying, she doesn't want to,' her two older sisters tell Sultan and Sharifa in front of Belqisa. Belqisa looks down. But Sharifa laughs. It's a good sign when the bride is unwilling. That indicates a pure heart."
And then there's the Taliban: their rules seem drawn up merely to crush individualism, and more still just there to suck the joy out of every day:
"Prohibition against female exposure...prohibition against music...prohibition against shaving...mandatory prayer...prohibition against the rearing of pigeons and bird-fighting...eradication of narcotics and the users thereof...prohibition against kite-flying...prohibition against reproduction of pictures...prohibition against gambling...prohibition against British and American hairstyles...prohibition against interest on loans, exchange charges and charges on transactions...prohibition against the washing of clothes by river embankments...prohibition against music and dancing at weddings...prohibition against playing drums...prohibition against tailors sewing women's clothes or taking measurements of women...prohibitions against witchcraft..."
And lets not forget the separate 'women-only' clause:
"If women dress fashionably, wear ornamented, tight, seductive clothes to show off, they will be damned by the Islam Sharia and can never expect to go to heaven. They will be threatened, investigated and severely punished by the religious police, as will the head of the family."
This is no easy read: it provides no answers and although the author attempts to remain impartial, you can sense her anger and incomprehension at the treatment women receive, even those in the fairly enlightened family she is staying with, running like a red vein through the book. Leila's existence almost chokes you with it's poignancy and you wish bitterly that the change taking place in that country would get there a little faster.
"She feels her heart, heavy and lonely like a stone, condemned to be crushed for ever. Leila turns, takes three paces to the door, closes it quietly behind her and goes out. Her crushed heart she leaves behind."
I am ashamed of my own complaining.


